<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With e-proxy, SEC signals it gets the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/</link>
	<description>&#124; Investor Relations Web Best Practices, Trends and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Investor Relations Blog &#187; E-proxy misunderstood</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Relations Blog &#187; E-proxy misunderstood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] With e-proxy, SEC signals it gets the Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With e-proxy, SEC signals it gets the Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IR Web Report Blog &#187; NASDAQ pushes firms to flout SEC web privacy rules</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>IR Web Report Blog &#187; NASDAQ pushes firms to flout SEC web privacy rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 03:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m equally frustrated with writing about the wrongs of personal tracking on IR websites, which I&#8217;ve done one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 times since March 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m equally frustrated with writing about the wrongs of personal tracking on IR websites, which I&#8217;ve done one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 times since March 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q4 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SEC changes to SOX and E-Proxies</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Q4 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SEC changes to SOX and E-Proxies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2006/12/13/with-e-proxy-sec-signals-it-gets-the-web/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] What this translates to is an increase in the use of the Internet to manage shareholder communication and disclosure. For more commentary check out Dominic’s post titled With e-proxy, SEC signals it gets the Web.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What this translates to is an increase in the use of the Internet to manage shareholder communication and disclosure. For more commentary check out Dominic’s post titled With e-proxy, SEC signals it gets the Web.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
