<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholder.com clients should read this</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/</link>
	<description>&#124; Investor Relations Web Best Practices, Trends and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Investor Relations Blog &#187; Thomson Financial vs. Shareholder.com</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Relations Blog &#187; Thomson Financial vs. Shareholder.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] I have to make the point again that Shareholder.com&#8217;s investor spying tools are the dumbest thing we&#8217;ve seen in all of the years we&#8217;ve been watching IR websites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have to make the point again that Shareholder.com&#8217;s investor spying tools are the dumbest thing we&#8217;ve seen in all of the years we&#8217;ve been watching IR websites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investor Relations Blog &#187; SEC mandates online proxy materials</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Relations Blog &#187; SEC mandates online proxy materials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/05/25/shareholdercom-clients-should-read-this/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a third option where companies can send print materials to some and use the notice-and-access model for others. In either case, the website hosting the proxy materials cannot breach the anonymity of shareholders using the site, which is a direct shot at Nasdaq-owned Shareholder.com and its clients. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a third option where companies can send print materials to some and use the notice-and-access model for others. In either case, the website hosting the proxy materials cannot breach the anonymity of shareholders using the site, which is a direct shot at Nasdaq-owned Shareholder.com and its clients. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
