<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My bad experience with first e-proxy notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/</link>
	<description>&#124; Investor Relations Web Best Practices, Trends and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edward Hallroan</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hallroan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>THE FIRST TIME I TRIED THE INVESTORECONNECT.COM SITE I GOT THROUGH THEN TRIED TO USE IT TO-DAY AND CAN&#039;T GET ANYWHERE, WE SHOULD&#039;NT HAVE TO WORK SO HARD TO VOTE OUR PROXY&#039;S I THINK I WILL GO BACK TO PAPER BALLOT&#039;S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE FIRST TIME I TRIED THE INVESTORECONNECT.COM SITE I GOT THROUGH THEN TRIED TO USE IT TO-DAY AND CAN&#8217;T GET ANYWHERE, WE SHOULD&#8217;NT HAVE TO WORK SO HARD TO VOTE OUR PROXY&#8217;S I THINK I WILL GO BACK TO PAPER BALLOT&#8217;S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted W. Royer</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted W. Royer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Frustrating!!!!
    I tried Yahoo, Firefox, and finally went back to Internet Explorer and the web site came up on first try.
   ML  (Blackrock)  you need to specify what browser to use to make this eballot work correctly.

Have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frustrating!!!!<br />
    I tried Yahoo, Firefox, and finally went back to Internet Explorer and the web site came up on first try.<br />
   ML  (Blackrock)  you need to specify what browser to use to make this eballot work correctly.</p>
<p>Have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gallus</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Gallus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I tried to sign on to this site. But its not there. I want to vote.
So I would like to see the proxy materials.
Meeting is to be held on 8/23/07 or 9/7/07</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to sign on to this site. But its not there. I want to vote.<br />
So I would like to see the proxy materials.<br />
Meeting is to be held on 8/23/07 or 9/7/07</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GEORGE R. NELSON</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>GEORGE R. NELSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>I HOPE THAT MY INVESTMENTS IN BLACKROCK DO A BETTER JOB THAN YOUR PROXY SITE

 MARDINEL@AOL.COM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HOPE THAT MY INVESTMENTS IN BLACKROCK DO A BETTER JOB THAN YOUR PROXY SITE</p>
<p> <a href="mailto:MARDINEL@AOL.COM">MARDINEL@AOL.COM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GEORGE R. NELSON</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>GEORGE R. NELSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I TRIED THE WEB SITE WWW. INVESTORECONNECT.COM AND GOT NO WHERE. PLEASE IN THE FURUTE SEND ME A REGULAR PAPER MAIL COPY IF YOU WANT ME TO VOTE..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I TRIED THE WEB SITE WWW. INVESTORECONNECT.COM AND GOT NO WHERE. PLEASE IN THE FURUTE SEND ME A REGULAR PAPER MAIL COPY IF YOU WANT ME TO VOTE..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Alice,

Thanks for commenting about this. I know a lot of people share your concerns. I have received emails from investors and noticed a lot of people trying to find out about investorconnect.com and investoreconnect.com by seaching for more information, and then ending up here.

My suggestion to anyone concerned about the process is to contact the companies who stock you own and tell them that they should post their annual meeting materials on a website their shareholders are familiar with, such as their corporate websites, and then provide links from those materials to the voting site.

I also urge anyone who has difficulty using the online materials to contact their companies.

Of course, you can also leave a comment here and you can be sure it will be read by people who have the power to do something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting about this. I know a lot of people share your concerns. I have received emails from investors and noticed a lot of people trying to find out about investorconnect.com and investoreconnect.com by seaching for more information, and then ending up here.</p>
<p>My suggestion to anyone concerned about the process is to contact the companies who stock you own and tell them that they should post their annual meeting materials on a website their shareholders are familiar with, such as their corporate websites, and then provide links from those materials to the voting site.</p>
<p>I also urge anyone who has difficulty using the online materials to contact their companies.</p>
<p>Of course, you can also leave a comment here and you can be sure it will be read by people who have the power to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice Daino</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Daino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>This was my first experience at trying to vote on a proxy via the internet.  I feel like I have been deceived and mislead.  It just re-enforced my feeling of distrust using the internet for anything personal.  Thank you for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was my first experience at trying to vote on a proxy via the internet.  I feel like I have been deceived and mislead.  It just re-enforced my feeling of distrust using the internet for anything personal.  Thank you for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuben Bogosian</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuben Bogosian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I went to the investoreconnect.com and it keeps telling me I have an invalid control #.  I went to the correct site and when it didn&#039;t work, I went to the co. site, nothing there, then to the spam sites mentioned above.  Back to the correct site only to be told again I have an invalid #.  What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the investoreconnect.com and it keeps telling me I have an invalid control #.  I went to the correct site and when it didn&#8217;t work, I went to the co. site, nothing there, then to the spam sites mentioned above.  Back to the correct site only to be told again I have an invalid #.  What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investor Relations Blog &#187; Is Shareholder.com client breaching SEC privacy rules?</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Relations Blog &#187; Is Shareholder.com client breaching SEC privacy rules?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>[...] My bad experience with first e-proxy notice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My bad experience with first e-proxy notice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2007/07/04/my-bad-experience-with-first-e-proxy-notice/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Interesting observation. The control numbers should only be required to vote, not to access the materials to make an informed vote.

As for Broadridge and how well known it is, most shareholders won&#039;t know, or care, who Broadridge is. Even if they said they were formerly part of ADP, it wouldn&#039;t make much difference. It&#039;s not like ADP is a household name either. Notice how even people who know, or should know, almost always refer to Broadridge as &quot;formerly part of ADP.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Interesting observation. The control numbers should only be required to vote, not to access the materials to make an informed vote.</p>
<p>As for Broadridge and how well known it is, most shareholders won&#8217;t know, or care, who Broadridge is. Even if they said they were formerly part of ADP, it wouldn&#8217;t make much difference. It&#8217;s not like ADP is a household name either. Notice how even people who know, or should know, almost always refer to Broadridge as &#8220;formerly part of ADP.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.496 seconds -->
