Dominic Jones

Dominic is a web strategy consultant to investor relations departments around the world and the founder of IRWebReport.com. More

5 responses to “Free online annual reports — in 5 minutes!”

  1. Peter Meadows

    That is pretty cool.

    The image based reports I used to provide had a few extra functions – download of financials directly into Excel, feedback functionality etc – but for the price (free!) this is a real alternative for those companies looking to offer more than a PDF.

    Good find.

    Pete

  2. Dominic Jones

    Hi Peter,

    If a company is only going to provide PDFs, then this is a no-brainer as an add-on.

    But there is still nothing better than a good HTML report (except perhaps paper!). Any company that moves to default electronic delivery without providing an HTML report is being extremely negligent, and is skating dangerously close to breaching the regs.

  3. Reflections on 2008 annual report season | IR Web Report

    [...] that the conversion process is largely automated. The fact is, similar or better conversions are available free of charge in as little as 5 minutes to anyone who knows how to open a file on a computer and copy and paste a [...]

  4. Eva

    I disagree with you it’s not that cut and dry. Your relying on ISSUU to host the materials they create or convert and handle the traffic. One of the SEC requirements is allow the document to be searchable your example is not. Companies that chose a third party to host their proxy materials have the option of the language they want to display on the site. While ISSUU is certainly a good tool what happens when you document doesn’t convert correctly because of the images, then I would venture to guess you’d have to call them for help and at that point they are going to charge you. I’m sure they don’t operate for free.

  5. Dominic Jones

    Eva,

    I’ll reiterate what I said in the article. I don’t advise companies to use any of these quick document conversion services. This article was about demonstrating how ridiculous it is that vendors are charging thousands of dollars to gullible companies for a service that is essentially free.

    You are correct that the SEC requires a searchable document. Image-based documents, such as those sold by unscrupulous vendors, are not fully searchable because you cannot use the “find in page” feature in the browser. Also note that companies *can* get a searchable version of the above type of document, for *free.*

    The SEC also requires a document that is “convenient” for online reading, which image-based documents are not. Look up the definition of “convenient,” it’s a very high standard in terms of web usability.

    But the key thing is that for the same cost as a crappy image-based document from Broadridge, Computershare, Thomson Reuters or mobular, companies could get a fully searchable, standards compliant HTML report.

    Finally, please disclose that you are affiliated with a vendor that sells image-based documents so people can take that into account. It doesn’t negate anything you have to say, but it is valuable context. Just say something like “I work for a vendor that sells image-based documents” or something like that if you can’t identify the firm.

Leave a Reply