<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did e-proxy figure in Apple&#039;s surprise say-on-pay loss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/</link>
	<description>&#124; Investor Relations Web Best Practices, Trends and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In proxy voting messes, Broadridge a common denominator &#124; IR Web Report</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>In proxy voting messes, Broadridge a common denominator &#124; IR Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>[...] shareholders have been complaining publicly about difficulties in receiving proxy voting instructions or materials from Broadridge and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shareholders have been complaining publicly about difficulties in receiving proxy voting instructions or materials from Broadridge and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McRitchie</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>James McRitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>While e-proxy may call for additional IR efforts, I hope it will also lead to an examination of the potential of developing systems to allow retail shareowners to assign their proxy rights to others.  I essence, this option would allow them to vote by brand. See
http://corpgov.net/news/archives2007/June.html#FillEmptyVotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While e-proxy may call for additional IR efforts, I hope it will also lead to an examination of the potential of developing systems to allow retail shareowners to assign their proxy rights to others.  I essence, this option would allow them to vote by brand. See<br />
<a href="http://corpgov.net/news/archives2007/June.html#FillEmptyVotes" rel="nofollow">http://corpgov.net/news/archives2007/June.html#FillEmptyVotes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top posts in March &#8216;08 &#124; IR Web Report</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Top posts in March &#8216;08 &#124; IR Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>[...] Did e-proxy figure in Apple’s surprise say-on-pay loss? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did e-proxy figure in Apple’s surprise say-on-pay loss? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn Davis complains about e-proxy &#124; IR Web Report</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn Davis complains about e-proxy &#124; IR Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>[...] error on its blogTalking about transparencyGreat online annual reports of 2008 &#8212; Part 1Did e-proxy figure in Apple&#8217;s surprise say-on-pay loss?NIRI members&#8217; discontent posted on WebMost popular posts in FebruaryIR Magazine reports fake [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] error on its blogTalking about transparencyGreat online annual reports of 2008 &#8212; Part 1Did e-proxy figure in Apple&#8217;s surprise say-on-pay loss?NIRI members&#8217; discontent posted on WebMost popular posts in FebruaryIR Magazine reports fake [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan,

I agree with you on the usability of the voting process. It is a bit discombobulating. The paper notice isn&#039;t good either, but there is an inherent problem in expecting people to react to the notice even if it was very clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan,</p>
<p>I agree with you on the usability of the voting process. It is a bit discombobulating. The paper notice isn&#8217;t good either, but there is an inherent problem in expecting people to react to the notice even if it was very clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Lejbak</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Lejbak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2008/03/05/did-e-proxy-figure-in-apples-surprise-say-on-pay-loss/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>I am a retail shareholder of Apple.

I found the online proxy vote confusing but convenient.  My feeling is that if the forms were designed better, more people would use them.

Usability, not the idea of online voting, is what is holding back mass-acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a retail shareholder of Apple.</p>
<p>I found the online proxy vote confusing but convenient.  My feeling is that if the forms were designed better, more people would use them.</p>
<p>Usability, not the idea of online voting, is what is holding back mass-acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
