YOU know how under the SEC’s notice-and-access process companies send their shareholders a postcard-size notice asking them to go online to view their annual meeting materials?
Well, I think you will agree with me that the single most important bit of information on that notice is the URL that you want people to go to. So when I saw this example I had to wonder what these people were thinking:
Which company is responsible for doing that? Just enter the URL to find out.
Oh, and here’s the easy way to fix this kind of problem. You’d think one of this company’s service providers would have told them.
P.S. The first person who sends me the name of the company concerned wins a prize.
IRWebReport.com was founded by Dominic Jones in February 2001 to promote best practices for online investor relations communications. In July 2010, the site had more monthly visitors than IR Magazine and IR Alert combined, according to Compete. We would like to thank our readers for their continued support and interest.
Check Out These Related Articles
- P&G's financial needle in a haystack — Updated By Dominic Jones HERE'S a really, really fun thing to do on a ...
- Firms blame Broadridge, SEC for e-proxy snafus REPRESENTATIVES of three US companies that have used the e-Proxy default electronic ...
- My bad experience with first e-proxy notice THE first companies to take advantage of the U.S. Securities and Exchange ...









After mistyping it twice, I got Urban Outfitters.
Urban Outfitters
Yikes, that is one ugly looking URL for Urban Outfitters. You would think a brand conscious retailer we know better than not at least include their name in the URL. Also, that comma at the end of the URL will trip up half the boomers that try to use it.
OK. There are so many ways to avoid this scenario.
If they’d thought about it ahead of time, they could have — for the princely sum of $4.95 to $8.95 — registered a domain (e.g. urbanoutfitters-agm.com)and forwarded people to the longer URL. Anyone can do that. Seriously, *anyone.* No tech know-how required.
They could have redirected from something like urbanoutfitters.com/annualmeeting to the longer URL at no additional cost. A little bit of tech know-how required.
They could have used TinyURL. A 4-year-old can do that, but it might not be kosher for SEC filings. However, it’s used in the UK for regulatory filings, so I don’t see why not here.
They could have, they could have…
One thing they did right was to send people to their site rather than direct to http://www.proxyvote.com or one of the other voting sites.
Why the SEC allows links direct to the voting sites instead of via the proxy materials, I don’t know because that was a big issue in the comment period. They didn’t want people to get the proxy card ahead of getting the proxy materials to ensure people cast informed votes.
But by sending people to http://www.proxyvote.com under notice-and-access (which is what is now happening in most cases) Broadridge and others are essentially delivering the proxy card ahead of the disclosure materials. Yes, I know the materials are there at the same time, but proxyvote.com is set up to drive voting, not drive people to the proxy statement and annual report.
Huh?
Actually the company that is hosting the proxy materials is Thomson Financial. They should know better than that. Sloppy work. Not urban outfitters fault.
Eva,
Thomson didn’t write the notice. They just host the site. And it is Urban Outfitters’ meeting, so they have to take responsibility.
As much as I am critical of Thomson, I can’t lay all of the blame at their door for this one. I’m not sure they would even have been aware that the company was going to use that URL. I’ve seen cases where redirects were in place for Thomson hosted materials.
The problem with TinyUrl and its ilk is that sysadmins add these to rapidly growing lists of websites to block.
Still, custom made URL shorteners a two a ha’penny to create
perhaps not as discreet but then why not use a simple blogger or wordpress re-direct… heck there are so many ways to avoid this.