<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online annual reports: will we ever get them right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2009/09/23/online-annual-reports-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2009/09/23/online-annual-reports-best-practices/</link>
	<description>&#124; Investor Relations Web Best Practices, Trends and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Pettersson</title>
		<link>http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2009/09/23/online-annual-reports-best-practices/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Pettersson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/?p=1073#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Good post. Here in Sweden, there&#039;s been a lot of talk about &quot;Annual report 2.0&quot;. What is really weird to me is that almost no companies use the web&#039;s possibilities in their online reporting. &quot;Annual report 2.0&quot; seems to mean a &quot;cool&quot; interface with lots of bells and whistles. To the main proponents of &quot;AR 2.0&quot;, the term certainly does not mean using links to serve up related information. Nor does it mean powerful search functionality. For annual reports, the web is still mostly seen as a distribution channel rather than as a communications tool. I&#039;m happy to say that I have just started a project with a major listed company that thinks along different lines and is not afraid to experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Here in Sweden, there&#8217;s been a lot of talk about &#8220;Annual report 2.0&#8243;. What is really weird to me is that almost no companies use the web&#8217;s possibilities in their online reporting. &#8220;Annual report 2.0&#8243; seems to mean a &#8220;cool&#8221; interface with lots of bells and whistles. To the main proponents of &#8220;AR 2.0&#8243;, the term certainly does not mean using links to serve up related information. Nor does it mean powerful search functionality. For annual reports, the web is still mostly seen as a distribution channel rather than as a communications tool. I&#8217;m happy to say that I have just started a project with a major listed company that thinks along different lines and is not afraid to experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.752 seconds -->
