By :Dominic
Jones Related: 10
common mistakes on IR websites
A NEW study from influential Web usability firm
Nielsen Norman Group provides some interesting insights into how
potential investors actually use investor relations websites when
assessing whether to invest in a company's stock.
|
Retail
investors struggle with complex sites,
while pros want more context.
|
|
Based on usability tests with 42 people, most of them inexperienced
retail investors, the report says that IR websites are generally
too complicated for many retail investors.
It also finds that the nine professional investors or analysts
in the study rarely used IR websites for financial research, preferring
to use richer resources like Bloomberg and Reuters. Institutional
investors are more interested in "the story" behind
the numbers and use IR websites for this type of information.
The report contains 65 guidelines for designing IR
sites based on watching investors as they tried to
complete assigned tasks. The guidelines have been
covered on this site before and include such basics
as including a clear link to your IR site on
your company's homepage, to narrower guidelines.
Nonetheless, the study provides valuable insights and concrete
affirmation from actual users of IR websites. If part of your
objective is to provide prospective retail investors with the
information they need to make a decision to invest in your company's
securities, then this report will provide you with some useful
guidelines.
Here are a few of the more interesting findings and guidelines
from the report which support our own work:
Sites undermine their own credibility
According to one of the report's authors, Dr. Jakob
Nielsen, widely viewed as the world's best known usability
expert, IR sites undermine their credibility with
investors in many ways.
More